27 avril 2005
15 avril 2005
Sonnet Cynique
Sonnet Cynique
Apple blossom is a springy tendril curling
Round; to the stingy ports of the North Vancouver
Sound. And life begins at half-past-three, I am sure.
Uncanny clarity wears their view down over
To a caravan of cars from the bleeding core--
Who, in rotary carrousels say, "Tir-Lan-Laire,"
A nihilistic apex they find there-- Coming
From the Southern Neighbor unto her empty corps.
Oh, I am sure that she is alive, for in Spring
Clothes she was draped as she telephoned all aloft
Pilons of her city, Putrid, nih'list, rotting.
Trying to swimmy in a snifter of liquors,
Laughing at skeleton I once thought vital,
I smell the apple blooms deconstruct her title.
Apple blossom is a springy tendril curling
Round; to the stingy ports of the North Vancouver
Sound. And life begins at half-past-three, I am sure.
Uncanny clarity wears their view down over
To a caravan of cars from the bleeding core--
Who, in rotary carrousels say, "Tir-Lan-Laire,"
A nihilistic apex they find there-- Coming
From the Southern Neighbor unto her empty corps.
Oh, I am sure that she is alive, for in Spring
Clothes she was draped as she telephoned all aloft
Pilons of her city, Putrid, nih'list, rotting.
Trying to swimmy in a snifter of liquors,
Laughing at skeleton I once thought vital,
I smell the apple blooms deconstruct her title.
08 avril 2005
A fucking Rant
Avant avoir lu ‘Xala’ d’Ousmane
The phallus is, as Lacan would have us admit and realize, a signification of lack. This is a deconstructed signifier. Look You! Allow how lack has been given a connotation and how, at present, this connotation has been infused with power. Lack. Power. Lack/Power. What is the meaning for understanding this seeming binary, which may prove to never be a binary on any signifying level? There is no doubt an economic base to the phallus. The feudal society was phallus-dominated, with its Church and Institutions. This is not any part of my argument; the history of the goddess’ penetration and subordination as consort is ancient; repeated and inherently proven, it has become useless in summary unless the summarizer wishes to exert intellectual power in changing this well accepted discursive mythology. We know the phallus/lack attributed power that solidified its perception as an economic sign, but this sign has always been tied to production. But what is the fact that an ideology of production has ruled where the phallus/lack has governed in the most evident manner doing? When we take phallus as a misread signifier, we are accepting an ideology that allows for utopian teleology (Christian Judgment). As we work to produce and move capital by orders of class, etc. we are acknowledging lack of more perfect means of production. Those of the capital-controlling bourgeois class, who have the ideological illusion of controlling capital, associate with the signification of the phallus. They feel the lack for utopian production/reproduction apparatuses, and stroke their cocks in this discourse owning power. But what then occurs within this knowledge-of-lack/power/phallus in impotence. It is obvious; impotence is the systemic and forced repression of forgetting the knowledge/power-structure. What is more, this is imposed by Nature, the goddess. In this way, history has implanted a deconstructed, yet illusively manifest system within the human psyche of today that we recognize as privileged economic discourse. The ideology may have no history and the base no traceable history; this is not to say that they have always been in struggle with the nature they are trying to define. The problem in definition is that we can only see anything in terms of language, and at that, especially in the west, the language of power/economic and lack. This is the outcome of the dialectic of all these elements. Each is subverted to the other to create a coherent discourse that allows nature to destroy it under psychological terms. But the psychological creates a cyclical, because although it allows for a separate break-up of ideological constructs through nature (and experience as I will discuss later), the psychological is once more subject to capital modes of production (i.e., if we cure the psychological need we cure nature and ensure production, etc.).
This is evident in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. This is the reason for a formalist view proposed by I-want-to-say-it-was Guerard, that the novella holds together as a ‘skein of ironies’. Ironies attempt to dissuade the political/production means from infiltrating and, inevitably, describing the situation of nature/psyche by casting the concepts as disparities. Remember how Kurtz is affected by nature to psychological depravity yet he is rich beyond believe in capital. Everyone who goes to or talks about Africa retains gloom. But why then is Kurtz’s beloved lied to. She is a pure goddess, she has been untouched by nature. But she is still subject to the phallus. The systematic separation of elements furthers irony, etc…
The phallus is, as Lacan would have us admit and realize, a signification of lack. This is a deconstructed signifier. Look You! Allow how lack has been given a connotation and how, at present, this connotation has been infused with power. Lack. Power. Lack/Power. What is the meaning for understanding this seeming binary, which may prove to never be a binary on any signifying level? There is no doubt an economic base to the phallus. The feudal society was phallus-dominated, with its Church and Institutions. This is not any part of my argument; the history of the goddess’ penetration and subordination as consort is ancient; repeated and inherently proven, it has become useless in summary unless the summarizer wishes to exert intellectual power in changing this well accepted discursive mythology. We know the phallus/lack attributed power that solidified its perception as an economic sign, but this sign has always been tied to production. But what is the fact that an ideology of production has ruled where the phallus/lack has governed in the most evident manner doing? When we take phallus as a misread signifier, we are accepting an ideology that allows for utopian teleology (Christian Judgment). As we work to produce and move capital by orders of class, etc. we are acknowledging lack of more perfect means of production. Those of the capital-controlling bourgeois class, who have the ideological illusion of controlling capital, associate with the signification of the phallus. They feel the lack for utopian production/reproduction apparatuses, and stroke their cocks in this discourse owning power. But what then occurs within this knowledge-of-lack/power/phallus in impotence. It is obvious; impotence is the systemic and forced repression of forgetting the knowledge/power-structure. What is more, this is imposed by Nature, the goddess. In this way, history has implanted a deconstructed, yet illusively manifest system within the human psyche of today that we recognize as privileged economic discourse. The ideology may have no history and the base no traceable history; this is not to say that they have always been in struggle with the nature they are trying to define. The problem in definition is that we can only see anything in terms of language, and at that, especially in the west, the language of power/economic and lack. This is the outcome of the dialectic of all these elements. Each is subverted to the other to create a coherent discourse that allows nature to destroy it under psychological terms. But the psychological creates a cyclical, because although it allows for a separate break-up of ideological constructs through nature (and experience as I will discuss later), the psychological is once more subject to capital modes of production (i.e., if we cure the psychological need we cure nature and ensure production, etc.).
This is evident in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. This is the reason for a formalist view proposed by I-want-to-say-it-was Guerard, that the novella holds together as a ‘skein of ironies’. Ironies attempt to dissuade the political/production means from infiltrating and, inevitably, describing the situation of nature/psyche by casting the concepts as disparities. Remember how Kurtz is affected by nature to psychological depravity yet he is rich beyond believe in capital. Everyone who goes to or talks about Africa retains gloom. But why then is Kurtz’s beloved lied to. She is a pure goddess, she has been untouched by nature. But she is still subject to the phallus. The systematic separation of elements furthers irony, etc…
Inscription à :
Articles (Atom)
